Nonresidential Construction Spending Stalls in May, Falls to Lowest Level in 2016
WASHINGTON, D.C., July 1—Nonresidential construction spending dipped 1.3 percent in May according to analysis of U.S. Census Bureau data released today by Associated Builders and Contractors (ABC). Nonresidential spending, which totaled $684.9 billion on a seasonally adjusted, annualized rate, has expanded 1.2 percent since May 2015.
April’s nonresidential spending figure was revised upwards from $688.2 billion to $694.1 billion. The previous three months of data—January, February, and March—all received slight downward revisions.
“Partially lost amidst all the discussion of Brexit and volatile financial markets is evidence that the U.S. economy continues to expand,” said ABC Chief Economist Anirban Basu. “Construction remains one of the economy’s busier segments, with many contractors continuing to report lengthy backlog and steady to expanding profit margins.
“Many of the factors that positioned the construction sector to become more active remain in place,” said Basu. “Global investment capital continues to flow aggressively to America and interest and capitalization rates remain low. National output continues to climb, albeit slowly. The e-commerce economy is driving demand for new fulfillment centers and warehouses, while technology companies continue to fuel construction in cities like San Jose, Boston, Seattle and San Diego.
“That’s what makes today’s and prior construction spending releases so surprising,” said Basu. When one adjusts for inflation, nonresidential construction spending today is essentially unaltered from a year ago. The industry’s recovery appears to have stalled. Not only have spending reports indicated a lack of positive momentum, but recent employment data also suggest that nonresidential construction activity has plateaued.
“Given lengthy backlog among contractors, there is little reason to think that the volume of nonresidential construction put in place will weaken significantly during the near term,” said Basu. The data are consistent with the notion that economic actors have become more cautious over the past year, perhaps delaying projects. This hesitation may be due to a number of factors, including concerns regarding overbuilding and the 2016 election cycle.
“Weakness in the nation’s energy sector has certainly contributed to this state of affairs, but the lack of nonresidential construction spending growth is not fully explained by low oil and natural gas prices,” concluded Basu. “A lack of aggressive public sector spending is also contributing to the industry’s recent malaise and the outlook for 2017 and 2018 remains decidedly murky.”
Only five of the 15 subsectors experienced spending growth on a monthly basis, and all five of the largest subsectors—power, highway and street, educational, manufacturing and commercial—declined in May.
April’s nonresidential spending figure was revised upwards from $688.2 billion to $694.1 billion. The previous three months of data—January, February, and March—all received slight downward revisions.
“Partially lost amidst all the discussion of Brexit and volatile financial markets is evidence that the U.S. economy continues to expand,” said ABC Chief Economist Anirban Basu. “Construction remains one of the economy’s busier segments, with many contractors continuing to report lengthy backlog and steady to expanding profit margins.
“Many of the factors that positioned the construction sector to become more active remain in place,” said Basu. “Global investment capital continues to flow aggressively to America and interest and capitalization rates remain low. National output continues to climb, albeit slowly. The e-commerce economy is driving demand for new fulfillment centers and warehouses, while technology companies continue to fuel construction in cities like San Jose, Boston, Seattle and San Diego.
“That’s what makes today’s and prior construction spending releases so surprising,” said Basu. When one adjusts for inflation, nonresidential construction spending today is essentially unaltered from a year ago. The industry’s recovery appears to have stalled. Not only have spending reports indicated a lack of positive momentum, but recent employment data also suggest that nonresidential construction activity has plateaued.
“Given lengthy backlog among contractors, there is little reason to think that the volume of nonresidential construction put in place will weaken significantly during the near term,” said Basu. The data are consistent with the notion that economic actors have become more cautious over the past year, perhaps delaying projects. This hesitation may be due to a number of factors, including concerns regarding overbuilding and the 2016 election cycle.
“Weakness in the nation’s energy sector has certainly contributed to this state of affairs, but the lack of nonresidential construction spending growth is not fully explained by low oil and natural gas prices,” concluded Basu. “A lack of aggressive public sector spending is also contributing to the industry’s recent malaise and the outlook for 2017 and 2018 remains decidedly murky.”
Only five of the 15 subsectors experienced spending growth on a monthly basis, and all five of the largest subsectors—power, highway and street, educational, manufacturing and commercial—declined in May.
