On March 7, the U.S. Department of Labor unveiled its long-awaited proposal
to update and revise the “white collar” overtime exemption regulations under the Fair Labor Standards Act, which DOL estimates
will make more than one million new workers eligible for overtime pay.
The Department is proposing to raise the current minimum salary for exemption from $455 per week ($23,660 annualized) to $679 per week ($35,308 annualized). Additionally, the proposal increases the total annual compensation requirement for “highly compensated employees” to $147,414 per year. While DOL’s new proposal does not include automatic increases to the minimum salary level or the highly compensated test, the agency has asked for comments on whether these tests should be proposed to be updated every four years through notice-and-comment rulemaking.
If finalized, the proposal would replace the 2016 final rule
issued by the DOL under the Obama Administration, which would have increased the minimum salary level for exemption to $913 per week ($47,476 annualized). ABC, along with several other business groups, sued DOL in federal court
in September 2016 and succeeded in blocking the final rule from taking effect.
ABC welcomes the long-awaited proposal and is pleased that it addresses many of the concerns that ABC expressed in comments submitted
to the department’s 2017 request for information and a statement at DOL’s overtime listening session
, including retaining the 2004 standard salary test, adopting only one standard salary level and not imposing automatic indexing of the salary level test. ABC hopes that the DOL will move swiftly to finalize this proposal.
DOL is soliciting public feedback on the proposal, and ABC plans to submit comments. Comments will be due 60 days upon publication in the Federal Register.
See the following resources for more information on DOL’s new overtime proposal:
DOL Overtime Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
DOL Overtime Proposal Press Release
DOL Overtime Proposal Fact Sheet
DOL Overtime Proposal Frequently Asked Questions
ABC General Counsel Littler Mendelson’s analysis