TEST Paragraph
Awards
Events/Products/Programs
Legislation
Politics and Policy
Regulations
Safety
State/Local News
Workforce Development
On May 22nd, U.S. Senator Jeff Flake (R-AZ) introduced The Opportunity in Construction Act (S. 1200), which aims to reform the way the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) calculates prevailing wages under the 1931 Davis-Bacon Act. Sen. Flake’s bill directs the DOL to set prevailing wages for federal and federally assisted construction projects covered by the Davis-Bacon Act and Related Acts using data collected by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). According to a press release from Sen. Flake’s office:
“The Davis-Bacon Act requires contractors engaging in certain federal construction projects pay workers on such projects not less than the locally prevailing wage for comparable work. Unfortunately for taxpayers, DOL has been unable to develop an effective process for determining market-rate wages, making the system vulnerable to bias and waste. For example, a prevailing wage rate for thousands of workers in a given locale can be based on the reported wages of as few as six workers from that area. Under certain conditions, DOL will simply rely on inflated union wage rates to set a prevailing wage, making it all but impossible for smaller businesses who cannot match union pay rates to compete with those unions when bidding on projects. In fact, a Government Accountability Office (GAO) investigation found 63 percent of Davis-Bacon prevailing wage rates are union rates despite the fact that only 14 percent of the construction workforce belongs to a union. That same GAO investigation also determined DOL cannot even verify whether its wage calculations accurately reflect local markets, and a separate DOL Inspector General investigation revealed nearly 100 percent of wage surveys reviewed by DOL contained errors. According to a Beacon Hill Institute analysis, Davis-Bacon wage rates are on average 22 percent above market rates, driving up labor costs by more than $2 billion dollars in 2016. According to a Heritage Institute analysis, using accurate wages would create approximately 30,000 additional construction jobs annually.”