On March 25, the U.S. House Committee on Natural Resources Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fisheries held a legislative hearing on a number of bills, including the ABC-supported ESA Amendment Act. Ahead of the hearing, ABC sent a letter to the committee in support of the bill’s efforts to modernize the Endangered Species Act.

H.R. 1897 streamlines the approval of voluntary conservation agreements and incidental take permits by removing duplicative permitting processes. The bill also clarifies the ESA Section 7 permitting process and provides regulatory certainty that a critical habitat will not be designated if a private landowner is working to implement a plan that conserves the listed species in question. Each of these provisions will provide additional clarity to the ESA that is critical for allowing construction projects to be completed on time and on budget.

During the hearing, the bill sponsor, Rep. Bruce Westerman, R-Ark., said the ESA, “is a well-intentioned law that has been hijacked by litigation and executive overreach.” He went on to stress the permitting relief this bill would provide. You can view his comments here.

On December 10, the U.S. House of Representatives passed S.4367, the Thomas R. Carper Water Resources Development Act of 2024, as amended, by a 399-18 vote. ABC wrote a letter in support of the legislation, which reauthorizes the WRDA and makes significant investments in America’s infrastructure. It also provides opportunities for contractors nationwide to participate on the majority of WRDA projects. The amended WRDA bill reflects months of negotiations between the U.S. House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works. It is likely the bill will pass the Senate before the end of the 118^th Congress. ABC will continue to support the bill while opposing the distribution of WRDA funds guided by the Biden administration’s Federal Acquisition Council Use of Project Labor Agreements for Federal Construction Projects final rule.

On September 11, the House Committee on Natural Resources held a legislative hearing on NEPA legislation including Rep. Westerman’s discussion draft, H.J. Res. 168 and H.R. 6129.  ABC sent a letter to the committee ahead of the hearing highlighting how the Biden-Harris administration's Council on Environmental Quality NEPA Phase 1 and Phase 2 final rules are making it more difficult to build important projects, marking a major step backward for critical infrastructure, the construction industry and America’s economic future. In the letter, ABC called on the Committee to advance Rep. Westerman’s discussion draft, H.J. Res. 168 and H.R.6129, which promote a coordinated, predictable and transparent process to streamline permitting.

On September 11, the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure's Subcommittee Water Resources and Environment held a hearing to examine Waters of the United States Implementation Post-Sackett Decision: Experiences and Perspectives. ABC sent a letter ahead of the hearing calling out the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for not providing the regulated community with sufficient guidance regarding their interpretation of the August 2023 WOTUS rule. In the letter, ABC urged the EPA and the Army Corps to fully comply with the Sackett decision and provide the regulated community with a clear, concise definition of WOTUS necessary to inform them of how to comply with the law while also serving as good stewards of the environment, as they did prior to the Biden-Harris administration’s shortsighted reversal of President Donald Trump’s WOTUS policies

On July 24, ABC sent a letter to the U.S. House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure’s Subcommittee on Highways and Transit in regard to their hearing on “Examining the Department of Transportation’s Regulatory and Administrative Agenda." ABC expressed concern with Secretary Buttigieg's role in promoting the Biden-Harris administration’s sweeping environmental and labor initiatives rather than prioritizing efficient and economical infrastructure improvements. Specifically, the DOT has advanced a number of stipulations on taxpayer funded infrastructure projects.

On July 10, the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Accountability held a hearing to analyze actions taken by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. In a letter to the committee, ABC expressed concern with EPA and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers final rule regarding amendments to the definition of “waters of the United States” subject to Clean Water Act regulation aimed at bringing their original January 2023 WOTUS rule into compliance with the U.S. Supreme Court’s May 25, 2023, decision in Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency. ABC noted that the revised rule fails to fully implement the court’s opinion specifically on the definition of “relatively permanent” waters and that it will likely result in continued litigation, regulatory uncertainty and confusion in the business community surrounding WOTUS.

On Aug. 29, the EPA and Corps issued the final rule making adjustments to WOTUS, including:

• Removing the “significant nexus” test entirely
• Removing the “interstate wetland” category
• Adjusting the definition of “adjacent waters” to mean “having a continuous surface connection”

ABC issued a press release criticizing the new rule and urging full compliance with the SCOTUS decision.

On July 9, the U.S. House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines and Hazardous Materials held a hearing titled, “An Examination of the California Air Resources Board’s (CARB) In Use Locomotive Regulation.” The hearing focused on the California Air Resources Board’s In-Use Locomotive Regulation. Pursuant to section 209(e) of the Clean Air Act, the regulation would ban all locomotives 23 years or older from operating within California and mandate zero-emissions locomotives by 2030. Prior to the hearing, ABC sent a letter to the committee expressing concern over the regulation and the wide-ranging impact it could have on the construction industry, including new logistical challenges and increased materials prices.

On June 13, the U.S. House Committee on Science, Space and Technology Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight held a hearing titled, “Environmentalism Off the Rails: How CARB will Cripple the National Rail Network.” The hearing focused on the California Air Resources Board’s In-Use Locomotive Regulation. Pursuant to section 209(e) of the Clean Air Act, the regulation would ban all locomotives 23 years or older from operating within California and mandate zero-emissions locomotives by 2030. Prior to the hearing, ABC sent a letter to the committee expressing concern over the regulation and the wide-ranging impact it could have on the construction industry, including new logistical challenges and increased materials prices.

On May 13, ABC sent a letter to Rep. Jay Obernolte, R-Calif., and the U.S. House Energy and Commerce Committee’s Environment, Manufacturing, and Critical Materials Subcommittee, urging the committee to oppose the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s authorization of new California regulations on locomotive emissions.

The regulations, implemented by the California Air Resources Board, state that all locomotives in California must be zero-emission models by 2030. Under the Clean Air Act, the EPA must approve CARB’s regulations before they can be finalized, but the agency has yet to issue a final decision.

ABC’s letter, submitted in advance of a May 15 subcommittee hearing on the EPA’s budget with Administrator Michael Regan, outlines the enormous cost of compliance with this regulation and the potential for wide-ranging impacts on key aspects of the construction materials supply chain. The letter requested that the subcommittee strongly question Administrator Regan regarding the agency’s position on the ban.

ABC previously joined a coalition of industry stakeholders in comments to the EPA asking the agency to deny authorization of the ban.

On Feb. 14, the House Committee on Natural Resources Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fisheries held a hearing on several bills, including the ABC-supported ESA Flexibility Act.

Ahead of the hearing, ABC sent a letter in support of H.R. 6784 recognizing the Endangered Species Act’s purpose of protecting species threatened with extinction and the need for science-based, data-driven actions that conserve those species and the habitats on which they depend. The ESA Flexibility Act gives the U.S. Department of the Interior and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service additional leeway when dealing with species listed as endangered under the ESA. While these agencies are already granted flexibility with species deemed “threatened,” this bill would allow for fit-for-purpose protections of “endangered” species while reducing undue regulatory burdens on development. The ESA Flexibility Act will allow for better management of species listed as endangered under the Endangered Species Act, such as the ABC-supported delisting of the northern long-eared bat.

You can view a recording the Subcommittee hearing here.